The Web's a curious space. Occasionally, I input all my handles, site affiliations, etc., to see what might turn up. Below is what turned up when I Googled AdultMaven and Pax Analysis together (Pax Analysis alone turns up a lot of tech stuff) It's from a June 6th posting at http://blog.myspace.com/vividentertainment:

ADULTMAVE.COM DIGS “MORPHINE”
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities

With the headline "Deliciously Dangerous Desire-Drug Delivers!" a review posted this week for the Vivid-alt movie "Morphine" on AdultMaven.com is short, to the point, and very positive: "Well-produced sultry gonzo fever dream." AdultMaven reviewer Pax Analysis says, "Throughout, the camera work is artful, with interesting angles, absorbing color textures, and sensual sense of movement and mood." The bottom line, says Pax Analysis: "Excellent mood-rich XXX fare." The launch party last week at Beauty Bar in Hollywood rated a story on the closely followed LAIST.com website, which noted that the movie "paints a dark picture of a young woman struggling to leave the tawdry life of prostitution and drug addiction to follow her dreams of being a Nashville songwriter…the highlight of the evening was the Black Eye Beauty Pageant(!),

>>>

I've noted all sorts of other sidebars relative to my cyber-activities, as well. A Huffington Post link re an old PsiOsphere.com reference to shooting sperm, chrissake. So if you're curious about what use what you write may be put to without your knowledge, do what I did. Obviously, folks don't always contact you or leave a post.

By the way, Maven Boyz, I noticed false start "Porn Star Racks" previously had an up front Google listing, but nothing re "Porno POV." Granted, I've neglected it, but jump-started it today. And you need to understand something. If I never posted another word, the mere three recapped postings there now are boilerplate classic regarding the ethical ironies of pornosophy, inevitable banalities and all. That said, more's forthcoming. I operate at an entirely different altitude, and I can only hope that Eli Cross's ironically complimentary conclusion that I'm too good for my own good, as it were, does not consign me to the wilderness indefinitely. I'm not referring to any of my mere cleverness re XXX gladiatorship, but what I have to say when an especially strong script or overview consideration merits it.

The differences between the terms "pornosophy," and "pornography," are that the former refers to an ironic ethics re true obscenity in society (as in the ABC program Soccer Mom posted reminder of, whereby pre-adult romance is branded legal sex offense for life, or sex toys need "medical" excuses), and the latter refers to graphically depicted sex. I shouldn't have to remind everybody what the real communicative meat is here. Freedom: use it or lose it. Commercially-depicted sexuality goes from mere entertainment to a force for the greater public good, if it dares to point up the wretchedly true obscenities of what so-called jurisprudence and religio-politics habitually sweep under the rug.

Gimme GnostiGoth Gonzo breathing fire.